← Back to Blog

CodeGateway Real Cost & Reliability Data: Reproducible Latency, Success Rate, and Billing Reconciliation

October 15, 2026

CodeGateway Real Cost & Reliability Data: Reproducible Latency, Success Rate, and Billing Reconciliation

Every number on this page comes from reproducible scripts, not marketing estimates. Latency/success-rate probe: `scripts/probe-gateway-metrics.py`. Billing reconciliation: `docs/pricing/reconcile-vs-direct.mjs`. Dimensions we did not measure are explicitly labeled Not measured. This page does not constitute any SLA commitment. Formal SLA / status page is a separate project.

TL;DR

Dimension

Reading

Definition

Token markup (vs official list price)

1.07× (+7.0%)

Flat across tiers; base price = official price

All-in (incl. 2% top-up fee + Stripe, amortized over a $10 top-up)

1.1695× (+17.0%)

You pay ≈ $1.17 per $1 of official-equivalent usage

$10 top-up charged to card

$10.93 (credit $10.00 + platform fee $0.20 + Stripe ≈ $0.73)

Script self-asserts

Call success rate (test, n=15)

15/15 = 100%

HTTP 2xx and parseable body

Claude Code compatibility

Verified end-to-end (protocol probe + real CLI)

/v1/messages

Codex CLI compatibility

Not measured (known protocol tension, see below)

/v1/responses

Cursor CLI

Not supported (official CLI has no custom base-URL config)

—

Latency P50/P95 / TTFT

No performance conclusion yet (client network floor pollution; see “How to read latency”)

Method is in-repo; will re-run on a clean network path


1. Billing reconciliation: what you actually pay

1.1 Three fee layers (code-level source of truth)

Layer

Value

Source

Token billing

base price × 1.07

backend/src/tier-config.ts (flat across tiers; monetization is on the top-up side)

Top-up service fee

face value 2%

backend/src/payment-config.ts platformFeeRate=0.02

Stripe gross-up

ceil((amount+30)/0.961) − amount (3.9% + $0.30)

Same file; platform fronts Stripe and folds it into what you pay

If we only said “1.07×”, we would understate your all-in cost by ~10 points. We chose to show the top-up side too.

1.2 $10 top-up example

credit        $10.00   (value you receive)
platformFee $ 0.20 (2% of face)
stripeFee $ 0.73 (ceil((1020+30)/0.961) − 1020)
─────────────────────
charged to card $10.93 ⇒ $1.0930 paid per $1 of credit

Recompute: node docs/pricing/reconcile-vs-direct.mjs (the script self-asserts; mismatch exits 1).

1.3 All-in multiplier for three representative workloads

Workload

Official direct

CG token billing

token-only

All-in (amortized $10 top-up)

W1 Claude Code medium session (40 turns, system/tools on 5-min cache) claude-sonnet-5-5

$4.90

$5.24

1.0700×

1.1695×

W2 Long-form generation (30K in / 8K out, no cache) claude-sonnet-5-5

$0.14

$0.15

1.0700×

1.1695×

W3 Batch classification (20K × 800in/50out) claude-haiku-4-5

$21.00

$22.47

1.0700×

1.1695×

Worked example (W1):

  • Official = 0.6M×$2 + 4.0M×$0.10 (cacheRead) + 1.2M×$2.50 (cacheWrite) + 0.03M×$10 = $4.90

  • CG base prices match official (verified after the 2026-10-15 price fix); ×1.07 = $5.24

  • All-in = 1.07 × 1.093 ($10 top-up amortization) = 1.1695

Batch caveat: CG has no batch tier today. If you would have used the official Batch API (50% off) anyway, W3 vs official Batch direct is about 2.34× all-in — that comparison does not apply to interactive work (W1/W2). Micro-amount footnote: if you top up exactly one workload, the fixed $0.30 Stripe fee dominates tiny amounts. In practice users use the $10 tier or free credit; the main table uses amortized economics.

1.4 Historical skew (fixed; kept for the record)

claude-sonnet-5-5 cacheRead was billed at $0.20/MTok while official is $0.10 ⇒ cache-heavy workloads briefly reached +26.5% all-in. Fixed 2026-10-14 and verified in production (GET /v1/pricing: cache_read_per_mtok=0.1). All workloads now uniformly +17.0%.


2. Reliability measurements: success rate first, latency with caution

2.1 Measurement definition (read this first)

  • Environment: https://api-test.codegateway.dev (test)

  • Window: 2026-10-14T08:17:21Z → 08:22:40Z (5m 19s)

  • Definition: client-visible end-to-end milliseconds, cold connections (new TLS per request), including this host’s network path

  • Re-run: see `docs/agent-cli-integration/metrics/README.md`

2.2 How to read latency (honest disclosure)

Network floor from the same session:

Control

n

P50

Meaning

/health (gateway edge floor)

3

4974 ms

no auth, no upstream

https://example.com (non-gateway host)

3

1436 ms

this host’s path floor

The floor from this machine to the public internet is on the order of 1.4–5 seconds. Gateway latency in the table below is dominated by the client path and must not be read as gateway server performance.

Therefore this page does not use absolute latency as a performance claim. The probe and floor-correction method are in the repo. We will publish comparable latency numbers only after a prod re-run from a clean network path. Until then, “we are faster” should not appear anywhere — including our own marketing.

2.3 Success rate (usable)

Surface

n

Success

Rate

Non-streaming /v1/chat/completions (stream:false)

10/model × 2 models

20/20

100%

Streaming TTFT (stream:true)

5/model × 2 models

10/10

100%

Success = HTTP 2xx and parseable body (non-streaming needs choices[0]; streaming needs ≥1 non-empty SSE delta).

Sample size and window as above. This is not a long-term SLA — it is a reproducible reading we can show in public docs.

2.4 Streaming TTFT (archived readings; not a conclusion)

Model

n

TTFT P50

TTFT P95

Total duration P50

deepseek-v4-flash

5

4891 ms

8170 ms

6289 ms

deepseek-v4-pro

5

4880 ms

9331 ms

6140 ms

TTFT = first non-empty SSE data: chunk (content or reasoning_content). Also polluted by the network floor — no performance conclusion.


3. Agent CLI compatibility

CLI

Protocol surface

Status

Evidence

Claude Code

/v1/messages

✅ Verified

Protocol probe 3/3 HTTP 200 + real CLI: claude -p ... --model claude-sonnet-4-6 returned ok, exit 0

Codex CLI

/v1/responses

⚠️ Not measured

Probe shows standard Responses body rejected; response is chat.completion-shaped. Real CLI not end-to-end verified. We do not claim compatibility

Cursor CLI

—

⛔ Not supported

Official CLI auth is Cursor-account only; no base-URL / custom provider config

Compatibility matrix and per-CLI setup: `docs/agent-cli-integration/` (drafts + tools for Cursor / Codex / Gemini CLI, etc.).


4. Reproducible integration examples

4.1 One-shot probe (verify your path)

bash
# API key required (see 4.2)
export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.codegateway.dev
export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN=<your CodeGateway key>

# Protocol self-check
curl -sS "$ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL/v1/messages" \
-H "x-api-key: $ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN" \
-H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","max_tokens":16,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"ok"}]}'

4.2 No official key / don’t want a foreign card?

Register on CodeGateway and get a key. Alipay and other local methods are supported (no international credit card required). free credit (current amount on the signup/pricing page) is enough to run the probe above.


5. What we did not measure (explicit list)

Dimension

Status

prod latency / success rate

Not measured (probe issues real billed calls; current egress floor is too high)

Codex CLI real end-to-end

Not measured (/v1/responses shape tension; separately tracked)

Production token mix (real in/out/cache ratios)

Not measured (billing recon uses defined representative scenarios)

Long-term SLA / annual availability %

No commitment (status page is a sibling project)

Cursor CLI

Not supported (product boundary, not a failure)


6. Takeaways

  1. Cost: token-side flat 1.07×; with top-up and payment fees fully counted, you pay about 1.17× official list. A $10 top-up yields $10.00 credit and charges $10.93 to the card. We publish the arithmetic and the scripts.

  2. Reliability: short-window success rate 15/15. Latency numbers are not concluded because of the client network floor — methodology is public; we will update after re-measurement.

  3. Compatibility: Claude Code verified; Codex CLI untested and unclaimed; Cursor unsupported.

  4. Next: prod re-measurement from a clean network path, Codex CLI /v1/responses shape verification, production token-mix measurement.

When numbers change, this page changes with them. Scripts are traceable in git history.

Author:CodeGateway Team

Solve API Key & Billing limits with CodeGateway

Lacking an official API key or facing overseas card payment issues? Create an sk-cg- key instantly. One key for Claude, GPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek: Claude and Gemini text models use the Anthropic Messages protocol (/v1/messages) — the OpenAI-compatible text endpoints do not accept them. Built-in smart routing and free trial credits included.

Sign up free
CodeGateway Cost & Reliability Benchmarks 2026 | Transparent Pricing